test: assert which event type each privilege routing key decodes to
authz_client / test (push) Skipped
authz_client / vulnerabilities (push) Skipped
pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Skipped
authz_client / vulnerabilities (pull_request) Successful in 46s
authz_client / test (pull_request) Successful in 59s
pre-commit / pre-commit (pull_request) Successful in 2m39s
authz_client / test (push) Skipped
authz_client / vulnerabilities (push) Skipped
pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Skipped
authz_client / vulnerabilities (pull_request) Successful in 46s
authz_client / test (pull_request) Successful in 59s
pre-commit / pre-commit (pull_request) Successful in 2m39s
Swapping the handler for Privilege.Removed to PrivilegeAdded passed the suite, and would turn every revocation into a grant. The Setup test now asserts each key's message type, the adapter is exercised for all four events (grant then revoke), and process only accepts the four privilege event types. CLAUDE.md warns against combining Setup() with WithReconnect (per-replica queues are re-created on reconnect, losing revocations sent meanwhile). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SV1epy2pKvBx3yDfhxATk2
This commit is contained in:
3 files changed
+35
-9
No files matched your search
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@ The `CompanyPrivileges` struct contains permission flags:
|
||||
|
||||
### Event Handling
|
||||
|
||||
Registers per-replica (transient) go-messaging-amqp consumers for privilege update events from the authz-service (`Setup()`), keeping the local privilege cache up-to-date.
|
||||
Registers per-replica (transient) go-messaging-amqp consumers for privilege update events from the authz-service (`Setup()`), keeping the local privilege cache up-to-date. Don't combine `Setup()` with go-messaging-amqp's `WithReconnect`: a reconnect declares new per-replica queues, so revocations published during the outage are lost unless `Fetch()` runs again. Services exit on connection loss (`CloseListener`) and re-fetch on start.
|
||||
@@ -104,8 +104,13 @@ func (h *PrivilegeHandler) Setup() []goamqp.Setup {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// privilegeEvent is the set of events Process handles.
|
||||
type privilegeEvent interface {
|
||||
UserAdded | UserRemoved | PrivilegeAdded | PrivilegeRemoved
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// process adapts Process to a typed go-messaging-amqp handler.
|
||||
func process[T any](h *PrivilegeHandler) spec.EventHandler[T] {
|
||||
func process[T privilegeEvent](h *PrivilegeHandler) spec.EventHandler[T] {
|
||||
return func(_ context.Context, event spec.ConsumableEvent[T]) error {
|
||||
return h.Process(&event.Payload)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+28
-7
@@ -645,22 +645,43 @@ func TestPrivilegeHandler_Setup(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
topology, err := goamqp.CollectTopology("some-service", handler.Setup()...)
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
var keys []string
|
||||
wiring := map[string]string{}
|
||||
for _, e := range topology.Endpoints {
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, spec.DirectionConsume, e.Direction)
|
||||
assert.True(t, e.Ephemeral, "%s must be a per-replica consumer", e.RoutingKey)
|
||||
keys = append(keys, e.RoutingKey)
|
||||
wiring[e.RoutingKey] = e.MessageType
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, []string{"User.Added", "User.Removed", "Privilege.Added", "Privilege.Removed"}, keys)
|
||||
// A key wired to the wrong type could turn a revocation into a grant.
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, map[string]string{
|
||||
"User.Added": "client.UserAdded",
|
||||
"User.Removed": "client.UserRemoved",
|
||||
"Privilege.Added": "client.PrivilegeAdded",
|
||||
"Privilege.Removed": "client.PrivilegeRemoved",
|
||||
}, wiring)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestPrivilegeHandler_process(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
ctx := context.Background()
|
||||
handler := New(WithBaseURL("base"))
|
||||
admin := func(p CompanyPrivileges) bool { return p.Admin }
|
||||
|
||||
err := process[UserAdded](handler)(context.Background(), spec.ConsumableEvent[UserAdded]{
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, process[UserAdded](handler)(ctx, spec.ConsumableEvent[UserAdded]{
|
||||
Payload: UserAdded{Email: "jim@example.org", CompanyID: "abc-123"},
|
||||
})
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
}))
|
||||
assert.False(t, handler.IsAllowed("jim@example.org", "abc-123", admin))
|
||||
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, []string{"abc-123"}, handler.CompaniesByUser("jim@example.org", func(CompanyPrivileges) bool { return true }))
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, process[PrivilegeAdded](handler)(ctx, spec.ConsumableEvent[PrivilegeAdded]{
|
||||
Payload: PrivilegeAdded{Email: "jim@example.org", CompanyID: "abc-123", Privilege: PrivilegeAdmin},
|
||||
}))
|
||||
assert.True(t, handler.IsAllowed("jim@example.org", "abc-123", admin))
|
||||
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, process[PrivilegeRemoved](handler)(ctx, spec.ConsumableEvent[PrivilegeRemoved]{
|
||||
Payload: PrivilegeRemoved{Email: "jim@example.org", CompanyID: "abc-123", Privilege: PrivilegeAdmin},
|
||||
}))
|
||||
assert.False(t, handler.IsAllowed("jim@example.org", "abc-123", admin))
|
||||
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, process[UserRemoved](handler)(ctx, spec.ConsumableEvent[UserRemoved]{
|
||||
Payload: UserRemoved{Email: "jim@example.org", CompanyID: "abc-123"},
|
||||
}))
|
||||
assert.Empty(t, handler.CompaniesByUser("jim@example.org", func(CompanyPrivileges) bool { return true }))
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user